About the organisation
WSP is a provider of multidisciplinary planning, engineering,
environmental and management skills and is active in the building,
environmental, consultancy, transport and utility infrastructure
fields. It is also one of Europe's largest consultants, employing
2500 people in the UK and approximately 6,000 people
worldwide.
Risk reduction
WSP has separate HR teams, distributed across six operating
companies. Its data was previously held in different locations,
with an inevitable variance in quality. This was compounded by HR
information being held on additional ad hoc spreadsheets that were
not linked to its software. Furthermore, separate systems for HR
and Payroll data caused inconsistency in information between the
two departments.
Inaccurate records meant that HR did not know the fundamentals
about its employees, such as their cost and location and
consequently took a number of uncomfortable risks. It had
uncontrolled absence; non-compliance with HR/HSE regulations;
exposure to tribunal claims; loss of property and staff
dissatisfaction. One ‘leaver’ drove off in a WSP company car and it
was not returned until a year later when the lease had expired.
Data disparity also led to an inconsistent approach to managing
employee relationships. The disjointed nature of HR resulted in
poor communication between HR and line managers, whilst senior
directors were seen as out of touch with employees. Essentially,
WSP was not regarded as an employee-friendly place to
work.
Improving process management
As a large organisation, WSP has a lot of movement that needs to
be carefully monitored and controlled. In 2003 WSP had 733
starters, 930 movers and 692 leavers, which involved significant
administrative costs.
Salary reviews were an intensive annual effort, involving the
manual integration of information across six operating companies.
In addition, Payroll was a monthly, error-prone paper chase, often
incurring double entry of information. As with the other processes,
it proved to be extremely labour-intensive.
The project vision was thus: “To provide an easy-to-use
system that enables effective business & people management,
supporting decision-making through the use of accurate employee
information.”
The new system
WSP initially bought personnel,
performance management and self-service modules from the SnowdropKCS
software suite. This included an integral reporting tool, containing several hundred
standard reports and workflow, an information tool that picks up
and delivers information via email. After their successful
implementation, WSP bought SnowdropKCS
Training & Development to add to their suite of HR
products.
WSP chose SnowdropKCS because the application is both flexible
and customisable, with a simple interface for easy navigation. As a
modular solution it fitted with the organisation’s implementation
plans for ongoing development, to keep up with business growth.
Importantly, the modules could seamlessly integrate, appearing on
one interface that could be accessed by the whole HR team,
regardless of location. This would address the issues of inaccurate
or duplicate data.
HR felt that the many administration-reducing tools in
SnowdropKCS would be invaluable to WSP in cutting the amount of
time spent upon process management. Online functionality was seen
as particularly important in empowering staff to maintain their own
information, whilst reducing the administrative strain upon HR.
An essential differentiator between Sage and its competitors was
its commitment to the project. Sage understood WSP’s business
structure, demonstrated through a thorough questioning of HR’s
processes and requirements. Sage also promised efficient
implementation.
The combination of a proven track record of satisfied clients,
an established internal helpdesk and ongoing support was also of
great reassurance to HR. Sophie Ashdown, Project Manager at WSP,
felt encouraged by Sage customers, who were “happier” than the
other clients she saw. More importantly, Sophie felt that she ‘got
on with’ Sage better than other suppliers, a good indication of the
business relationship she could expect to maintain later on.
Implementation
Approach
WSP took an iterative approach to implementation, installing the
personnel module first and then rolling out self-service to line
managers and employees.
It was important for the organisation to act with caution, as
they were aware of resistance from some areas, due to concerns that
an HRM system might take away jobs. Following 9/11 the construction
industry experienced a significant downturn, with resultant
scepticism from employees about any investments that they did not
perceive to be directly linked to profit making.
HR was also keen to allay any fears regarding data security.
Some people expressed concerns that colleagues other than line
managers would be able to view their personal data, or that IT
would have unlimited access. Gradual implementation would allow
people to get used to the system slowly and help HR to combat these
fears.
Taking time to sort through the data and get HR trained on the
system was also of vital importance. A rushed implementation would
only serve to repeat the problems surrounding the previous
systems.
Stages of implementation
Employee access to self-service
All employees were given access to their data via the
self-service system, re-named 'Opus' by WSP. Rebranding SnowdropKCS
as 'Opus' was essential in engaging employees with the new online
software. A separate identity was an important part of identifying
that the system belonged to them. WSP also held a competition for
the name to reinforce that the solution was for employees - giving
them ownership.
WSP made sure that Opus was marketed well to employees. Adverts
demonstrating the benefits of online access were posted on the
intranet, advertising for example, how to book holiday via Opus.
Posters were put up on noticeboards, refreshment areas and, most
successfully, on the backs of the toilet cubicle doors (a sure fire
way to capture staff’s attention!). HR also did a series of
presentations to all offices, which served to raise its profile and
visibility.
Employees could view job, property, holiday entitlement and
sickness entitlement details, whilst having the facility to edit,
amongst others, address, bank and dependant details. Sophie Ashdown
felt that allowing everyone to get to grips with personal data
would be a good introduction to the system for line managers,
before providing them with extra access.
Later on, WSP introduced an editable area for education,
qualifications and professional memberships. The HR team felt that
giving control to potentially sensitive data reinforced a key WSP
value of ‘Trust’. Reports were emailed to line managers by
workflow, with qualification updates, to keep them in the loop. The
HR team also began to gather photos for all employees to view on
Opus, which fed into the intranet telephone directory.
Line manager and director access to
self-service
Line managers and directors were given additional online access.
They could view team data including emergency contacts, home
telephone number and job details. They also had the facility to
authorise absences and view the annual Health and Safety
review.
To assist line managers with the administrative side of Opus, an
“authoriser” level of access was set up for selected PA’s and
secretaries. These PAs are copied in on any workflow emails that
prompt line managers to authorise leave requests. If the line
manager is out of the office or too busy, the “authoriser” can
update the employee’s absence request on the line manager’s
behalf.
WSP then updated the ‘salary modelling’ function that is used by
all directors to conduct annual salary reviews and produce salary
letters. A new health & safety area was also created to record
H&S data and produce cards for site access.
In the final stages of the self-service roll-out, holiday
booking and online authorisation were enabled. All absences can now
be booked and recorded online, including sickness, paternal leave
and compassionate leave.